Talk:Call of Duty: Zero Tolerance/@comment-25360704-20170825125847/@comment-5670680-20170908151541

Firstly, I stated a fact directed at your comment about technology advancing on a realistic level, trying to show you that your philosophy is unreasonable. I did not say anything about whether having 'old' equipment would be a bad idea, nor did I actually say it wouldn't be realistic.

Secondly, you don't have to jab back at criticism, especially if you have a philosophy that you are confident in. However, this shows me you have no idea what you're actually doing besides throwing stuff which you consider cool together.

Wait and read it a few times and do not start putting words in my mouth. You publish for a consumer, who you want to share your ideas with and have fun in showcasing those ideas. Criticism is not to shoot down your ideas, rather it is a way of improving it in the long run.

– INTERESTING RANT ABOUT THE CURRENT STATE OF THE WIKI AND QUALITY –

At this point, I'm kinda ranting, but (I think) peers of mine (would) agree that the standard of pages these days is subpar, and a lot of it has to do with people not giving and not taking criticism and/or (competing to) make a better product through actual good ideas.

Example: The phase when more and bigger was considered better made all products similar to one another. People who I consider to be good writers have all been there, but now do not do that. Instead, they grab a concept, and they make sure that everything has a reason, and everything makes sense. You can only achieve that with a critical eye, and if you do not have that yourself, through criticism instead. Then, you create something that not only is generally better liked, it is also a better achievement for yourself.